NLRB v. Noel Canning

National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning
Argued January 13, 2014
Decided June 26, 2014
Full case nameNational Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. Noel Canning, et al.
Docket no.12-1281
Citations573 U.S. 513 (more)
134 S. Ct. 2550; 189 L. Ed. 2d 538; 2014 U.S. LEXIS 4500
ArgumentOral argument
Opinion announcementOpinion announcement
Case history
Prior705 F.3d 490 (D.C. Cir. 2013) (affirmed)
Holding
For purposes of the Recess Appointment Clause, the Senate is in session when it says that it is if, under its own rules, it retains the capacity to transact business. D.C. Circuit affirmed.
Court membership
Chief Justice
John Roberts
Associate Justices
Antonin Scalia · Anthony Kennedy
Clarence Thomas · Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen Breyer · Samuel Alito
Sonia Sotomayor · Elena Kagan
Case opinions
MajorityBreyer, joined by Kennedy, Ginsburg, Sotomayor, and Kagan
ConcurrenceScalia (in judgment), joined by Roberts, Thomas, and Alito
Laws applied
U.S. Const., Art. II, §2, cl. 3

National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, 573 U.S. 513 (2014), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that the President of the United States cannot use his authority under the Recess Appointment Clause of the United States Constitution to appoint public officials unless the United States Senate is in recess and not able to transact Senate business. The Court held that the clause allows the president to make appointments during both intra-session and inter-session recesses but only if the recess is of sufficient length, and if the Senate is actually unavailable for deliberation, thereby limiting future recess appointments. The Court also ruled that any office vacancy can be filled during the recess, regardless of when it arose.[1] The case arose out of President Barack Obama's appointments of Sharon Block, Richard Griffin, and Terence Flynn to the National Labor Relations Board and Richard Cordray as the director of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.[2][3][4][5][6][7]

  1. ^ National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning, 573 U.S. 513 (2014).
  2. ^ Liptak, Adam (June 26, 2014). "Supreme Court Curbs President's Power to Make Recess Appointments". The New York Times. Retrieved June 26, 2014.
  3. ^ "National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning | LII Supreme Court Bulletin | LII / Legal Information Institute". law.cornell.edu. January 3, 2014. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  4. ^ "Justices to Decide the Scope of Recess-Appointment Authority | Legal Times". nationallawjournal.com. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  5. ^ "National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning : SCOTUSblog". scotusblog.com. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  6. ^ Ornstein, Norman J. (January 21, 2014). "Disarming the White House - NYTimes.com". The New York Times. Retrieved March 3, 2014.
  7. ^ "National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law". oyez.org. Retrieved March 3, 2014.

© MMXXIII Rich X Search. We shall prevail. All rights reserved. Rich X Search